<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Screen resolution statistics</title>
	<link>http://www.tamingthebeast.net/blog/web-development/screen-resolution-statistics-0906.htm</link>
	<description>Ecommerce, web marketing and development news and research by Michael Bloch of Taming the Beast.net</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 20:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Igor</title>
		<link>http://www.tamingthebeast.net/blog/web-development/screen-resolution-statistics-0906.htm#comment-2166</link>
		<dc:creator>Igor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.tamingthebeast.net/blog/web-development/screen-resolution-statistics-0906.htm#comment-2166</guid>
		<description>Consider that all internet users are not clear eyed 20 year olds and it will become apparent why the use 800x600 resolution. They can't read the small type comfortably. Nor can they read page after page of reversed type on the ludicrous web sites who use such crap. A basic principle of typography is to mack your printing easily legible. Artsy-Craftsy sucks. Don't try to get fancy and use hard to read type faces. Good serif and sans serif type faces abound. Pick a good one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Consider that all internet users are not clear eyed 20 year olds and it will become apparent why the use 800&#215;600 resolution. They can&#8217;t read the small type comfortably. Nor can they read page after page of reversed type on the ludicrous web sites who use such crap. A basic principle of typography is to mack your printing easily legible. Artsy-Craftsy sucks. Don&#8217;t try to get fancy and use hard to read type faces. Good serif and sans serif type faces abound. Pick a good one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
